This case study guides learners through recognizing harassment based on race and religion, identifying legal and policy implications, and practicing an effective managerial response. It emphasizes documenting events, providing support, and implementing preventative measures in a global context.
Case Study 1: Harassment Based on Race and Religion in a Global Team
This case study guides learners through recognizing harassment based on race and religion, identifying legal and policy implications, and practicing an effective managerial response. It emphasizes documenting events, providing support, and implementing preventative measures in a global context.

Scenario overview A multinational project team holds weekly standups. A coworker makes repeated comments about another team member's race and religion during meetings. The affected employee feels marginalized, and the team lead notices a pattern of discomfort and reluctance to speak up. The lead escalates the issue to HR for guidance and action.

Protected characteristics involved Race and religion are the central protected characteristics. National origin and ethnicity may also be implicated in related remarks. These characteristics influence daily interactions and require proactive inclusion efforts.

Legal and policy considerations Harassment and hostile environment protections exist across many jurisdictions. Policies should define prohibited conduct, reporting channels, and remedies. Cross border teams must align standards with local laws while maintaining a consistent organizational stance.

Immediate actions for managers Intervene during or right after the incident. Document what occurred, who was involved, and what was said. Remind the team about the code of conduct. Provide support to the affected employee and ensure no retaliation occurs.

Remediation and prevention Conduct a brief coaching conversation with the involved parties, offer diversity and inclusion training, and reinforce respectful communication norms. Review and, if needed, update policies or guidelines to address similar scenarios in the future.

Discussion prompts How would you determine if the conduct crosses a harassment threshold? What steps ensure accountability without escalating tensions? How can the organization prevent recurrence across multinational teams?